Background Bleeding is a common, morbid, and costly complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. While bleeding avoidance strategies ( BAS ) are effective, they are used paradoxically less in patients at high risk of bleeding. Whether a patient-centered approach to specifically increase the risk-concordant use of BAS and, thus, reverse the risk-treatment paradox is associated with reduced bleeding and costs is unknown.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWe report direct observation of the formation of a subsurface species at metal electrodes in liquid electrolytes and of its migration within the solid's surface layer, below a chemisorbed electrochemical double layer. Using in situ video-rate scanning tunneling microscopy, we find for adsorbed sulfide on bromide-covered Ag(100) electrodes reversible transitions between adsorption sites on top of the surface and within a vacancy in the first Ag layer. In the latter state, the sulfide surface diffusion can be enhanced by orders of magnitude, which we attribute to vacancy-mediated diffusion underneath the bromide adlayer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCoadsorbed anions are well-known to influence surface reactivity and dynamics at solid-liquid interfaces. Here we demonstrate that the chemical nature of these spectator species can entirely determine the microscopic dynamic behavior. Quantitative in situ video-STM data on the surface diffusion of adsorbed sulfur atoms on Cu(100) electrodes in aqueous solution covered by bromide and chloride spectators, respectively, reveal in both cases a strong exponential potential dependence, but with opposite sign.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Same-day discharge (SDD) after elective percutaneous coronary intervention is safe, less costly, and preferred by patients, but it is usually performed in low-risk patients, if at all. To increase the appropriate use of SDD in more complex patients, we implemented a "patient-centered" protocol based on risk of complications at Barnes-Jewish Hospital.
Methods And Results: Our objectives were as follows: (1) to evaluate time trends in SDD; (2) to compare (a) mortality, bleeding, and acute kidney injury, (b) patient satisfaction, and (c) hospital costs by SDD versus no SDD (NSDD); and (3) to compare SDD eligibility by our patient-centered approach versus Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions guidelines.