Expert Opin Pharmacother
October 2017
The majority of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients experience a good clinical response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and biologic therapies (bDMARDs). However, treatment failure with these drugs can represent a relevant clinical problem. Moreover, in daily clinical practice, the appropriate identification of patients eligible for these agents can be conditioned by numerous aspects, mainly represented by comorbidities, such as history of malignancies, chronic and recurrent infectious diseases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: The majority of Psoriatic Arthritis patients experience a good clinical response to anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α therapies. However, treatment failure with anti-TNF-α can represent a relevant clinical problem.
Areas Covered: We review the efficacy and safety profile of biological therapies that have been reported from randomized, controlled trials in phase II and phase III available in Pubmed Database for agents targeting IL-12/23p40 antibody (ustekinumab) and IL-17 (secukinumab), inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4, (apremilast), and of JAK/STAT pathways (tofacitinib) and CTLA4 co-stimulation (abatacept) in Psoriatic Arthritis.
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) can have peculiar effects on bone, including mechanisms of bone loss such as erosions, but also of bone formation, such as ankylosis or periostitis. The aim of the present study was to describe the prevalence of fractures in patients with PsA as compared to healthy controls and to investigate determinants of fractures among cases. For both cases and controls, radiographs were read to identify vertebral fractures (VF), and the presence of femoral neck or other nonvertebral fractures was obtained from patients' medical history.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF