Perineoplasty is a frequently performed procedure as part of prolapse surgery. Despite its frequent use, there is a lack of evidence on the optimal indication, surgical technique and adverse outcomes. We intended to gain insight into the current opinions on indications and techniques of perineoplasty among (uro)gynecologists worldwide.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Open
May 2024
Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pessary therapy as an initial treatment option compared with surgery for moderate to severe pelvic organ prolapse (POP) symptoms in secondary care from a healthcare and a societal perspective.
Design: Economic evaluation alongside a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial with a 24-month follow-up.
Setting: 21 hospitals in the Netherlands, recruitment conducted between 2015 and 2022.
Objective: To determine whether laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) or vaginal sacrospinous fixation (VSF) is the most optimal surgical treatment in patients with POP-Q stage ≥2 vaginal vault prolapse (VVP).
Design: Multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) and prospective cohort study alongside.
Setting: Seven non-university teaching hospitals and two university hospitals in the Netherlands.
Importance: Pelvic organ prolapse is a prevalent condition among women that negatively affects their quality of life. With increasing life expectancy, the global need for cost-effective care for women with pelvic organ prolapse will continue to increase.
Objective: To investigate whether treatment with a pessary is noninferior to surgery among patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse.
Background: Female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has a negative effect on female sexual functioning and with an increasing life expectancy female sexual dysfunction caused by POP will be an arising global issue.
Aim: Improvement in female sexual functioning, measured with the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR), 24-months after pessary or surgery, for both sexually active (SA) and sexually inactive women (NSA) presenting with POP.
Methods: A multicenter prospective comparative cohort study was conducted in 22 Dutch hospitals.
Background: To put statistically significant changes in patient reported outcome measurement (PROM) questionnaires into a clinical perspective, the concept of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) can be used.
Aim: To determine the MCID for the summary score for sexually active (SA) women of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR), a validated instrument which assesses sexual functioning (SF) for patients suffering from a symptomatic pelvic floor disorder.
Methods: Patients participating in a multicentre prospective cohort study comparing pessary therapy with surgery for a symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) filled in the PISQ-IR at baseline and 12 months' follow-up.
Introduction And Hypothesis: The objective of this study was creating a prediction model for continued pessary use in patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and evaluating the percentage of continued pessary use after 12 months.
Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study in patients with symptomatic POP stage ≥ 2. All patients received a pessary as primary treatment.
Introduction And Hypothesis: The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of routine follow-up visits for pessary cleaning, the effect of extended time intervals between visits and the proportion of patients being able to self-manage their pessary for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study in patients with a stage ≥II POP without previous POP surgery. All patients received a pessary as primary treatment.
BMC Womens Health
April 2019
Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) affects up to 40% of parous women which adversely affects the quality of life. During a life time, 20% of all women will undergo an operation. In general the guidelines advise a vaginal operation in case of uterine descent: hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament plication (VH), sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH) or a modified Manchester operation (MM).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction And Hypothesis: To identify practice variation in management of patients with a vaginal pessary for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
Methods: A nationwide survey was sent to all Dutch gynecologists with a special interest in urogynecology.
Results: The response rate was 59 %.
BMC Womens Health
September 2014
Background: Pelvic organ prolapse is a common health problem: the lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse by the age of 85 years is 19%. Pelvic organ prolapse has significant negative effects on a woman's quality of life. Worldwide, vaginal hysterectomy is the leading treatment method for patients with symptomatic uterovaginal prolapse.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Obstet Gynecol
September 2014
Small bowel obstruction through a broad ligament defect is a very rare condition. We present 2 cases, one without any associated abdominal trauma. Rapid diagnosis and treatment of this rare condition is of paramount importance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Physiotherapy involving pelvic-floor muscle training is advocated as first-line treatment for stress urinary incontinence; midurethral-sling surgery is generally recommended when physiotherapy is unsuccessful. Data are lacking from randomized trials comparing these two options as initial therapy.
Methods: We performed a multicenter, randomized trial to compare physiotherapy and midurethral-sling surgery in women with stress urinary incontinence.
More than 13,000 vaginal prolapse operations are performed in the Netherlands each year. Native tissue repair is associated with a re-operation risk of 20-30%. Randomized trials demonstrate that mesh reinforced repairs are anatomically and functionally more effective in the short and medium term.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: In pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair, the use of synthetic mesh is not only increasing but also a subject of discussion. The focus shifts from anatomical toward functional outcome, with sexual function being an important parameter. One of the concerns with mesh usage in POP surgery is the possible negative effect on sexual function.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct
November 2009
Introduction And Hypothesis: The use of vaginally implanted polypropylene meshes in the treatment of prolapse is becoming increasingly popular. We set out to detect how often bacterial colonisation of the mesh occurs and if the intraoperative sterility procedures that are applied matter.
Methods: In 64 consecutive women, bacterial colonisation was compared between two intraoperative sterility procedures.