Purpose: As radiation therapy treatment grows more complex over time, treatment delivery has become more susceptible to adverse events and patient safety risks from use error. The radiation therapy monitoring and treatment delivery user interface explored in this study was redesigned using ecological interface design, a human factors engineering method, and evaluated to improve treatment safety.
Methods And Materials: An initial design concept was created based on previously completed analysis and informally evaluated in focus groups with radiation therapists.
Background: The design complexity of critical care ventilators (CCVs) can lead to use errors and patient harm. In this study, we present the results of a comparison of four CCVs from market leaders, using a rigorous methodology for the evaluation of use safety and user experience of medical devices.
Methods: We carried out a comparative usability study of four CCVs: Hamilton G5, Puritan Bennett 980, Maquet SERVO-U, and Dräger Evita V500.