Diagnosis and management of Barrett esophagus: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.

MR1 : ESGE recommends the following standards for Barrett esophagus (BE) surveillance:- a minimum of 1-minute inspection time per cm of BE length during a surveillance endoscopy- photodocumentation of landmarks, the BE segment including one picture per cm of BE length, and the esophagogastric junction in retroflexed position, and any visible lesions- use of the Prague and (for visible lesions) Paris classification- collection of biopsies from all visible abnormalities (if present), followed by random four-quadrant biopsies for every 2-cm BE length.Strong recommendation, weak quality of evidence. MR2:  ESGE suggests varying surveillance intervals for different BE lengths.

Barrett's esophagus with low-grade dysplasia: high rate of upstaging at Barrett's esophagus referral units suggests progression rates may be overestimated.

Background And Aims: The reported progression rate from low-grade dysplasia (LGD) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) ranges from .4% to 13.4% per year.

Antibodies against human papillomavirus proteins in Barrett's dysplasia and intramucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma.

High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16/18 have been associated with Barrett's dysplasia (BD)/esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Nevertheless, no data exist in relation to serological analysis for HPV antibodies in BD/EAC with site-specific viral DNA status. We prospectively examined antibodies to multiple HPV types in 438 patients representing hospital/reflux controls and Barrett's metaplasia (BM)/BD/intramucosal EAC.

Comparative outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's oesophagus with different baseline histology.

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is currently recommended for dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus (BO); however, there are limited data on treatment response when stratified by baseline histology.

Objective: The objective of this article is to evaluate RFA outcomes and durability for BO with different baseline histology.

Methods: Patients treated with RFA between 2007 and 2017 at a single institution were retrospectively included.