This study investigates how different motion planning algorithms, implemented on a collaborative robot (cobot), are perceived by 48 human subjects. The four implemented algorithms ensure human safety based on the concept of speed and separation monitoring, but differ based on the following characteristics: (a) the cobot motion happens either along a fixed path or with a trajectory that is continuously planned in real time via nonlinear model predictive control, to increase cobot productivity; (b) the cobot speed is further reduced-or not-in real time based on heart rate measurements, to increase perceived safety. We conclude that (1) using a fixed path-compared to real-time motion planning-may reduce productivity and, at least when heart rate measurements are not used to modify the cobot speed, increases perceived safety; (2) reducing cobot speed based on heart rate measurements reduces productivity but does not improve perceived safety; (3) perceived safety is positively affected by habituation during the experiment, and unaffected by previous experience.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnnu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc
July 2020
This study investigates the applicability of Electromyography (EMG) signal classification algorithms with relatively low training time to control prosthetic devices. The perceived quality of control depends on many factors, such as the 1) accuracy of the algorithm, 2) the complexity of the control, and 3) the ability to compensate for the error. The high granularity of control in the time domain reduces the perceived effect of error but also limits the classification accuracy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF