Flow diversion versus parent artery occlusion with bypass in the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: Immediate and short-term outcomes of the randomized trial.

Objective: We performed prospective randomized comparison of clinical and surgical outcomes of flow diversion versus PVO and bypass in patients with complex anterior circulation aneurysms.

Patients And Methods: Open, prospective, randomized, parallel group, multicenter study of complex intracranial aneurysms treatment was conducted. Patients with complex intracranial aneurysms of anterior circulation with neck is more than 4 mm wide, dome/neck ratio is equal or less than 2:1, which is suitable for flow diversion and occlusion with bypass were included in the study.

Experience using pipeline embolization device with Shield Technology in a patient lacking a full postoperative dual antiplatelet therapy regimen.

Utilization of flow diverting devices is accompanied with dual antiplatelet therapy to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events, even though this increases the risk of hemorrhagic complications. The updated Pipeline Flex embolization device with Shield Technology has been created using a phosphorylcholine coating that reduces thrombogenicity and possibly reduces the need for dual antiplatelet therapy. However, because of the potential risk to patients of utilizing a pipeline embolization device without dual antiplatelet therapy, the pipeline embolization device with Shield Technology has not been tested in human subjects without dual antiplatelet therapy, and its contribution to preventing thromboembolic events is therefore unknown.