Spine surgeons facing second opinions: a qualitative study.

Background Context: The social and technological mutation of our contemporary period disrupts the traditional dyad that prevails in the relationship between physicians and patients.

Purpose: The solicitation of a second opinion by the patient may potentially alter this dyad and degrade the mutual trust between the stakeholders concerned. The doctor-patient relationship has often been studied from the patient's perspective, but data are scarce from the spine surgeon's point of view.

Becoming a neurosurgeon in France: A qualitative study from the trainees' perspective.

Introduction: The training of neurosurgeons is evolving in a world of socio-professional changes, including the technological revolution, administrative pressure on stakeholders, reduced working hours, geographical heterogeneity, generational changes, to name but a few.

Research Question: This qualitative study aimed to explore experiences and feedback of French neurosurgical trainees concerning their training.

Material And Methods: The grounded theory approach was used with 23 neurosurgical trainees' interviews.

Spine neurosurgeons facing the judicialization of their profession: disenchantment and alteration of daily practice-a qualitative study.

Background: The judicialization of medicine can lead to professional disenchantment and defensive attitudes among surgeons. Some quantitative studies have investigated this topic in spine surgery, but none has provided direct thematic feedback from physicians. This qualitative study aimed to identify the impact of this phenomenon in the practice of spine neurosurgeons.