Health Soc Care Deliv Res
March 2024
Background: Socio-economic inequalities in health have been in the public agenda for decades. General practice has an influential role to play in mitigating the impact of inequalities especially regarding chronic conditions. At the moment, general practice is dealing with serious challenges in relation to workforce shortages, increasing workload and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAlthough general practice can contribute to reducing health inequalities, existing evidence provides little guidance on how this reduction can be achieved. We reviewed interventions influencing health and care inequalities in general practice and developed an action framework for health professionals and decision makers. We conducted a realist review by searching MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for systematic reviews of interventions into health inequality in general practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Healthcare organisations recognise the moral imperative to address inequalities in health outcomes but often lack an understanding of which types of interventions are likely to reduce them. This realist review will examine the existing evidence on the types of interventions or aspects of routine care in general practice that are likely to decrease or increase health inequalities (ie, inequality-generating interventions) across cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Methods And Analysis: Our realist review will follow Pawson's five iterative stages.
Introduction: Goal-setting is recommended for patients with multimorbidity, but there is little evidence to support its use in general practice.
Objective: To assess the feasibility of goal-setting for patients with multimorbidity, before undertaking a definitive trial.
Design And Setting: Cluster-randomised controlled feasibility trial of goal-setting compared with control in six general practices.