Publications by authors named "Anne-Kathrin Warzecha"

Nervous systems encode information about dynamically changing sensory input by changes in neuronal activity. Neuronal activity changes, however, also arise from noise sources within and outside the nervous system or from changes of the animal's behavioral state. The resulting variability of neuronal responses in representing sensory stimuli limits the reliability with which animals can respond to stimuli and may thus even affect the chances for survival in certain situations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Behavioral responses of an animal vary even when they are elicited by the same stimulus. This variability is due to stochastic processes within the nervous system and to the changing internal states of the animal. To what extent does the variability of neuronal responses account for the overall variability at the behavioral level? To address this question we evaluate the neuronal variability at the output stage of the blowfly's (Calliphora vicina) visual system by recording from motion-sensitive interneurons mediating head optomotor responses.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

So far, it remains largely unresolved to what extent neuronal noise affects behavioral responses. Here, we investigate, where in the human visual motion pathway noise originates that limits the performance of the entire system. In particular, we ask whether perception and eye movements are limited by a common noise source, or whether processing stages after the separation into different streams limit their performance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We investigate the impact of monitor frame rate on the human ocular following response (OFR) and find that the response latency considerably depends on the frame rate in the range of 80-160 Hz, which is far above the flicker fusion limit. From the lowest to the highest frame rate the latency declines by roughly 10 ms. Moreover, the relationship between response latency and stimulus speed is affected by the frame rate, compensating and even inverting the effect at lower frame rates.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Response variability is a fundamental issue in neural coding because it limits all information processing. The reliability of neuronal coding is quantified by various approaches in different studies. In most cases it is largely unclear to what extent the conclusions depend on the applied reliability measure, making a comparison across studies almost impossible.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Neurons embedded in networks are thought to receive synaptic inputs that do not drive them on their own, but modulate the responsiveness to driving input. Although studies on brain slices have led to detailed knowledge of how nondriving input affects dendritic integration, its origin and functional implications remain unclear. We tackle this issue using an ensemble of fly wide-field visual interneurons.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Variable behavioral responses to identical visual stimuli can, in part, be traced back to variable neuronal signals that provide unreliable information about the outside world. This unreliability in encoding of visual information is caused by several noise sources such as photon noise, synaptic noise, or the stochastic nature of ion channels. Neurons of the fly's visual motion pathway have been claimed to represent perfect encoders, with photon noise as the main noise source limiting their performance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A conductance-based model for synaptic transmission and postsynaptic integration reveals how postsynaptic responses and their variability depend on the number of synaptic inputs. With increasing number of balanced stochastic excitatory and inhibitory inputs, the postsynaptic responses and their variance first increase and then decrease again. This non-linearity can be attributed to an anti-correlation between the total excitatory and inhibitory currents.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Information processing in visual systems is constrained by the spatial and temporal characteristics of the sensory input and by the biophysical properties of the neuronal circuits. Hence, to understand how visual systems encode behaviourally relevant information, we need to know about both the computational capabilities of the nervous system and the natural conditions under which animals normally operate. By combining behavioural, neurophysiological and computational approaches, it is now possible in the fly to assess adaptations that process visual-motion information under the constraints of its natural input.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF