Individual differences in the use of top-down versus bottom-up cues to resolve phonetic ambiguity.

How listeners weight a wide variety of information to interpret ambiguities in the speech signal is a question of interest in speech perception, particularly when understanding how listeners process speech in the context of phrases or sentences. Dominant views of cue use for language comprehension posit that listeners integrate multiple sources of information to interpret ambiguities in the speech signal. Here, we study how semantic context, sentence rate, and vowel length all influence identification of word-final stops.

Do They Know It's Christmash? Lexical Knowledge Directly Impacts Speech Perception.

We recently reported strong, replicable (i.e., replicated) evidence for lexically mediated compensation for coarticulation (LCfC; Luthra et al.

Resolving competing predictions in speech: How qualitatively different cues and cue reliability contribute to phoneme identification.

Listeners have many sources of information available in interpreting speech. Numerous theoretical frameworks and paradigms have established that various constraints impact the processing of speech sounds, but it remains unclear how listeners might simultaneously consider multiple cues, especially those that differ qualitatively (i.e.

Contra assertions, feedback improves word recognition: How feedback and lateral inhibition sharpen signals over noise.

Whether top-down feedback modulates perception has deep implications for cognitive theories. Debate has been vigorous in the domain of spoken word recognition, where competing computational models and agreement on at least one diagnostic experimental paradigm suggest that the debate may eventually be resolvable. Norris and Cutler (2021) revisit arguments against lexical feedback in spoken word recognition models.

LexFindR: A fast, simple, and extensible R package for finding similar words in a lexicon.

Language scientists often need to generate lists of related words, such as potential competitors. They may do this for purposes of experimental control (e.g.

Robust Lexically Mediated Compensation for Coarticulation: Christmash Time Is Here Again.

A long-standing question in cognitive science is how high-level knowledge is integrated with sensory input. For example, listeners can leverage lexical knowledge to interpret an ambiguous speech sound, but do such effects reflect direct top-down influences on perception or merely postperceptual biases? A critical test case in the domain of spoken word recognition is lexically mediated compensation for coarticulation (LCfC). Previous LCfC studies have shown that a lexically restored context phoneme (e.

A graph-theoretic approach to identifying acoustic cues for speech sound categorization.

Human speech contains a wide variety of acoustic cues that listeners must map onto distinct phoneme categories. The large amount of information contained in these cues contributes to listeners' remarkable ability to accurately recognize speech across a variety of contexts. However, these cues vary across talkers, both in terms of how specific cue values map onto different phonemes and in terms of which cues individual talkers use most consistently to signal specific phonological contrasts.