This editorial explores the intricate landscape of supplement use in oncology, highlighting the growing interest and challenges surrounding their integration into cancer care. It discusses the disparity in regulatory oversight between supplements and pharmaceutical drugs, the blurred lines in their classification, and the ethical complexities in patient-doctor communication. The importance of transparency, shared decision-making, and realistic expectations is emphasized.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: As recommended in the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines, assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) should be a relevant endpoint in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing new anticancer therapies. However, previous publications by our group and others revealed a frequent underestimation and underreporting of HRQoL results in publication of RCTs in oncology. Herein, we systematically reviewed HRQoL reporting in RCTs testing new treatments in advanced prostate, kidney and urothelial cancers and published between 2010 and 2022.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComparison of first-line FOLFIRINOX (FFN) and nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (NabGem) in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The authors analyzed data from 160 patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma receiving first-line FFN (n = 43) or NabGem (n = 117). FFN and NabGem were similar in median progression-free survival (24.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPatients with locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) do not present distant metastases but are not eligible for surgery upfront. Chemotherapy regimens, such as FOLFIRINOX (FFN) or nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (GemNab) in combination with loco-regional treatments are generally used in this setting. However, the best treatment choice is unknown.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF