Publications by authors named "Anna L Armannsdottir"

Background: Prosthetic foot stiffness, which is typically invariable for commercially available prosthetic feet, needs to be considered when prescribing a prosthetic foot. While a biological foot adapts its function according to the movement task, an individual with lower limb amputation may be limited during more functionally demanding gait tasks by their conventional energy storing and return prosthetic foot.

Research Question: How do changes in prosthetic foot stiffness during incline walking affect biomechanical measures as well as perception of participants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Adaptation of lower limb function to different gait tasks is inherently not as effective among individuals with lower limb amputation as compared to able-bodied individuals. Varying stiffness of a prosthetic foot may be a way of facilitating gait tasks that require larger ankle joint range of motion.

Methods: Three stiffness settings of a novel prosthetic foot design were tested for level walking at three speeds as well as for 7,5° incline and decline walking.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Energy storing and returning prosthetic feet are commonly prescribed. Research has demonstrated advantages to use these types of prosthetic feet. However, their stiffness in the sagittal plane is fixed and cannot adapt to different walking tasks and user preference.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This article presents a novel design of a prosthetic foot that features adaptable stiffness that changes according to the speed of ankle motion. The motivation is the natural graduation in stiffness of a biological ankle over a range of ambulation tasks. The device stiffness depends on rate of movement, ranging from a dissipating support at very slow walking speed, to efficient energy storage and return at normal walking speed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To explore user-centered design methods currently implemented during development of lower limb wearable robots and how they are utilized during different stages of product development.

Background: Currently, there appears to be a lack of standardized frameworks for evaluation methods and design requirements to implement effective user-centered design for safe and effective clinical or ergonomic system application.

Method: Responses from a total of 191 experts working in the field of lower limb exoskeletons were analyzed in this exploratory survey.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF