Publications by authors named "Anna Chiarelli"

Background: This study assessed health care system costs and resource utilization for adult women with breast cancer in Ontario, Canada. The goal was to update costs by stage, age, and phase of care from a health care system perspective.

Data And Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using linked population-based administrative data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Elevated mammographic density (MD) is a significant risk factor for breast cancer, and this study investigates how factors like childbirth, age at first birth, and breastfeeding relate to MD in a large group of women across different countries.
  • The research analyzed data from 11,755 women aged 35-85 years, focusing on how factors such as the number of births and the timing of the first birth influence measurements of MD.
  • The findings suggest that having more children decreases MD, while older age at first birth is linked to higher MD, particularly in post-menopausal women, highlighting the complex relationships between reproductive factors and breast density.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: A prospective cohort study was undertaken within the PERSPECTIVE I&I project to evaluate healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with breast cancer risk assessment and screening and overall costs stratified by risk level, in Ontario, Canada.

Methods: From July 2019 to December 2022, 1997 females aged 50 to 70 years consented to risk assessment and received their breast cancer risk level and personalized screening action plan in Ontario. The mean costs for risk-stratified screening-related activities included risk assessment, screening and diagnostic costs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Risk-stratified breast screening has been proposed as a strategy to overcome the limitations of age-based screening. A prospective cohort study was undertaken within the PERSPECTIVE I&I project, which will generate the first Canadian evidence on multifactorial breast cancer risk assessment in the population setting to inform the implementation of risk-stratified screening. Recruited females aged 40-69 unaffected by breast cancer, with a previous mammogram, underwent multifactorial breast cancer risk assessment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A study analyzed healthcare costs and resource use for nearly 645,000 women aged 50-74 in the Ontario Breast Screening Program between 2011-2014, looking at different screening frequencies and outcomes.
  • Results showed that women aged 60-74 incurred the highest average costs, particularly with annual screenings linked to family or personal history, totaling CAD 5425.
  • Although annual screenings for women with dense breasts led to higher costs per breast cancer diagnosis, they also had lower costs per false positive compared to biennial screenings, indicating a need for careful resource allocation in breast cancer screening programs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Given the controversy over the effectiveness of age-based breast cancer (BC) screening, offering risk-stratified screening to women may be a way to improve patient outcomes with detection of earlier-stage disease. While this approach seems promising, its integration requires the buy-in of many stakeholders. In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed Canadian healthcare professionals about their views and attitudes toward a risk-stratified BC screening approach.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Women with a remaining lifetime risk of breast cancer of ≥25%, estimated using the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS) model, were eligible for the High Risk Ontario Breast Screening Program. This study examined the performance of IBIS 10-year risk estimates in the program.

Methods: This retrospective study included 7487 women aged 30 to 69 years referred to the High Risk Ontario Breast Screening Program between July 1, 2011, and December 31, 2016, with follow-up until December 31, 2018.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The multifactorial risk prediction model BOADICEA enables identification of women at higher or lower risk of developing breast cancer. BOADICEA models genetic susceptibility in terms of the effects of rare variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes and a polygenic component, decomposed into an unmeasured and a measured component - the polygenic risk score (PRS). The current version was developed using a 313 SNP PRS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Our study was to determine breast cancer screening costs in Ontario, Canada for screenings conducted through a formal (Ontario Breast Screening Program, OBSP) and informal (non-OBSP) screening program using administrative databases. Included women were 49-74 years of age when receiving screening mammograms between 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2019. Each woman was followed for a screening episode with screening and diagnostic components, and costs were calculated as an average cost per woman per month in 2021 Canadian dollars.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Health care professionals must actively engage in cancer prevention strategies, but this study found many lack familiarity with polygenic risk scores (PRS) and knowledge about risk-stratified breast cancer screening.
  • A survey of 593 professionals showed that a significant number were unfamiliar with PRS, with 61% feeling they lacked adequate knowledge for effective BC screening.
  • Most participants expressed a need for more training, preferring online courses and webinars for continuing professional development.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Early age at menarche and tall stature are associated with increased breast cancer risk. We examined whether these associations were also positively associated with mammographic density, a strong marker of breast cancer risk.

Methods: Participants were 10,681 breast-cancer-free women from 22 countries in the International Consortium of Mammographic Density, each with centrally assessed mammographic density and a common set of epidemiologic data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted cancer systems worldwide. Quantifying the changes is critical to informing the delivery of care while the pandemic continues, as well as for system recovery and future pandemic planning.

Objective: To quantify change in the delivery of cancer services across the continuum of care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • In Ontario, breast cancer diagnoses come through various paths, including the Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP), primary care providers, or symptomatic presentations; this study aimed to examine how these routes impact aspects like health care use and survival rates.
  • Of the 51,460 patients analyzed, a significant majority (83%) were diagnosed at OBSP-affiliated sites, with those screened by OBSP diagnosed about a month earlier than those who presented symptoms.
  • The findings suggest that being referred to OBSP-affiliated assessment sites is linked to improved overall survival for patients, indicating the importance of the screening program in timely diagnosis and effective care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In the Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP) annual screening improved breast cancer detection for women 50-74 years with a family/personal history compared to biennial, while detection was equivalent for women screened annually for mammographic density ≥75%. This study compares the risk of interval or higher stage invasive cancers among postmenopausal women screened annually vs biennially by age and estrogen use. A retrospective design identified 4247 invasive breast cancers diagnosed among concurrent cohorts of women 50-74 screened in the OBSP with digital mammography between 2011 and 2014, followed until 2016.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Breast cancer screening in Ontario, Canada, was deferred during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, and a prioritization framework to resume services according to breast cancer risk was developed. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the pandemic within the Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP) by comparing total volumes of screening mammographic examinations and volumes of screening mammographic examinations with abnormal results before and during the pandemic, and to assess backlogs on the basis of adherence to the prioritization framework.

Methods: A descriptive study was conducted among women aged 50 to 74 years at average risk and women aged 30 to 69 years at high risk, who participated in the OBSP.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - In risk-stratified cancer screening, different risk factors are used to categorize individuals into specific risk groups, providing tailored screening recommendations based on their estimated absolute cancer risk.
  • - Absolute risk can be evaluated as a lifetime risk or a shorter-term risk, but many guidelines currently use age-independent thresholds for identifying high-risk women, which can lead to misclassification.
  • - The study suggests that using age-dependent risk thresholds would improve the identification of high-risk women for screening, thereby ensuring appropriate recommendations for both younger and older women.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates how Canadian women's understanding of genetic discrimination (GD) affects their willingness to participate in breast cancer screening programs informed by genetic risk assessments.
  • It reveals that a significant portion of women (about 34.7%) are very concerned about potential misuse of their health information by employers and insurance companies, suggesting anxiety over GD.
  • The findings highlight a gap in knowledge regarding legal protections against GD and emphasize the need for better public education to improve participation in genetic testing for breast cancer risk assessment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Although some studies have shown increasing radiologists' mammography volumes improves performance, there is a lack of evidence specific to digital mammography and breast screening program performance targets. This study evaluates the relationship between digital screening volume and meeting performance targets.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 493 radiologists in the Ontario Breast Screening Program who interpreted 1,762,173 screening mammograms in participants ages 50-90 between 2014 and 2016.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Regular screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality. However, in women with dense breasts, the performance of screening mammography is reduced, which is reflected in higher interval cancer rates (ICR). In Canada, population-based screening mammography programs generally screen women biennially; however, some provinces and territories offer annual mammography for women with dense breast tissue routinely and/or on recommendation of the radiologist.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

It is essential to quantify the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer screening, including for vulnerable sub-populations, to inform the development of evidence-based, targeted pandemic recovery strategies. We undertook a population-based retrospective observational study in Ontario, Canada to assess the impact of the pandemic on organized cancer screening and diagnostic services, and assess whether patterns of cancer screening service use and diagnostic delay differ across population sub-groups during the pandemic. Provincial health databases were used to identify age-eligible individuals who participated in one or more of Ontario's breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung cancer screening programs from January 1, 2019-December 31, 2020.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Early detection of breast cancer through screening reduces breast cancer mortality. The benefits of screening must also be considered within the context of potential harms (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Risk-stratified screening for breast cancer (BC) is increasingly considered as a promising approach. However, its implementation is challenging and needs to be acceptable to women. We examined Canadian women's attitudes towards, comfort level about, and willingness to take part in BC risk-stratified screening.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Survival after a breast cancer diagnosis is poorer in First Nations women with a preexisting comorbidity compared with comorbidity-free First Nations women in Ontario, Canada. Given the high prevalence of diabetes in this population, it is important to determine whether preexisting diabetes is related to poorer survival after a breast cancer diagnosis.

Methods: All First Nations women were identified from a cohort of First Nations people diagnosed with breast cancer in diagnostic periods-1995 to 1999 and 2000 to 2004-and seen at a regional cancer program (RCP) in Ontario.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Trans people face uncertain risk for breast cancer and barriers to accessing breast screening. Our objectives were to identify and synthesize primary research evidence on the effect of cross-sex hormones (CSHs) on breast cancer risk, prognosis and mortality among trans people, the benefits and harms of breast screening in this population, and existing clinical practice recommendations on breast screening for trans people.

Methods: We conducted 2 systematic reviews of primary research, 1 on the effect of CSHs on breast cancer risk, prognosis and mortality, and the other on the benefits and harms of breast screening, and a third systematic review of guidelines on existing screening recommendations for trans people.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The Ontario Breast Screening Program expanded in 2011 to include annual MRI and mammography for high-risk women aged 30-69, focusing on cancer detection benefits based on age and risk.
  • A study of 8,782 women found that combining MRI with mammography significantly improved cancer detection sensitivity compared to mammography alone, particularly in women aged 50-69.
  • Results showed that for younger women (30-39), MRI alone might be sufficient for screening, but with a trade-off in specificity when combined with mammography.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: fopen(/var/lib/php/sessions/ci_sessioni0vl85qibd7j7h0rqgp1vd9rgrf13hnf): Failed to open stream: No space left on device

Filename: drivers/Session_files_driver.php

Line Number: 177

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_start(): Failed to read session data: user (path: /var/lib/php/sessions)

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 137

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once