Meniscal degeneration is a common finding even in young patients' knees, and it is regarded as a predictor for the onset of early osteoarthritis (OA). When symptomatic, it represents a challenge since arthroscopic surgery provides unpredictable results: recent evidence has shown that partial meniscectomy is not better than conservative management up to 2 years of follow-up, and the removal of meniscal tissue may accelerate OA progression toward OA. Intra-articular injection of corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid may help in providing temporary symptomatic relief, but no influence should be expected on the quality of the meniscal tissue.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Tendinopathies are a common cause of disability among the general population, and their management is challenging due to the degenerative nature of these disorders. The aim of this paper is to perform a scoping review of the available clinical evidence on the application of cell-based therapies for the management of elbow and rotator cuff tendinopathies, in order to summarize the current application methods and to shed light on the therapeutic potential and current limitations of these biologic approaches.
Materials And Methods: A scoping review of the literature was performed on the PubMed and Scopus databases using the following inclusion criteria: clinical reports of any level of evidence, written in English, with no time limitation, on the use of cell-based approaches to treat rotator cuff or elbow tendinopathies, including studies on biological augmentation during the surgical procedure.
Aim: To compare the value of Procalcitonin (PCT) as a marker of surgical site infection to other inflammatory markers, including C-Reactive Protein (CRP), White Cell Count (WCC) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) in patients undergoing a number of spinal procedures. This study also aims to describe the biokinetic profile of the above-named markers in patients developing surgical site infection and those remaining infection-free post-operatively.
Methods: 200 patients undergoing four routine elective spinal procedures were included for analysis.