Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
September 2022
Introduction: This multicenter trial on patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treated with an oral appliance aimed to determine the effect of sleeping positions.
Methods: A cohort of 314 patients with OSA were enrolled and evaluated at 8 weeks and 1 year, focusing on treatment effects. At baseline and the 2 follow-ups, new polygraphic registration comparing the proportion of treatment responders without position-dependent OSA (non-position-dependent OSA [non-POSA]) and with POSA was used.
Introduction: This 10-year prospective cephalometric study evaluates the influence of a mandibular protruding device (MPD) in people with obstructive sleep apnea and snoring.
Methods: A baseline study population of 77 people was followed biennially. After 10 years, 65 people (45 MPD users and 20 stopped-MPD users) were reexamined.
Background: The clinical benefit of bibloc over monobloc appliances in treating obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) has not been evaluated in randomized trials. We hypothesized that the two types of appliances are equally effective in treating OSA.
Objective: To compare the efficacy of monobloc versus bibloc appliances in a short-term perspective.
Objectives: This 10-year prospective study aimed to measure and evaluate the teeth position and occlusion following 10-year nocturnal use of a mandibular protruding device (MPD) in subjects with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) or snoring.
Materials And Methods: Seventy-seven consecutive patients diagnosed with OSA/snoring were treated with an MPD. Fabrication of dental casts with jaw registration indexes in the intercuspal position was carried out at baseline and at follow-up, a construction bite was made, and an MPD was fitted.
The aim was to identify the incidence and types of possible adverse events in the masticatory system after treatment with a mandibular protruding device (MPD) during a 2-year period in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or snoring. The subjects comprised 65 middle-aged patients (44 OSA patients, 21 snorers). A clinical examination and a questionnaire concerning signs and symptoms from the masticatory system were performed before, after 6 months, and after 2 years of MPD use.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjectives: To evaluate subjective discomfort and somnographic measures of patients with obstructive sleep apnea and snoring problems who had been treated for 2 years with a mandibular protruding device (MPD).
Methods: The study population comprised 65 patients with a pretreatment diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) ( n = 44) or habitual snoring without apnea (n = 21). After a baseline medical and somnographic examination, a functional examination of the stomatognathic system, and a questionnaire focused on sleep-related qualities, each patient received an MPD.
The aims of this study were to compare the maximum range of protrusion determined with a ruler with measurements made using a George Gauge (GG) and to validate the methods of measurement (ruler and GG) of the advancement established by mandibular protruding devices (MPDs), using cephalograms as the gold standard. The study comprised 77 patients (63 males, 14 females, mean age 54 years, range 31-73 years) with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) (n = 50) or complaints of snoring (n = 27). After a medical examination that included an overnight somnographic registration and a dental and stomatognathic examination, each patient was given a MPD.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of a mandibular protruding device (MPD) after 2 years of nocturnal use on the upper airway and its surrounding structures. Lateral cephalograms in the upright position were taken of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and of patients with snoring problems at the beginning of treatment and at the 2-year follow-up. Two computer programs were used to analyze the cephalograms.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe objectives were to evaluate the impact of body posture on cephalometric measures and the level and the extent to which treatment with a mandibular protruding device (MPD) affects pharyngeal width. The study was composed of 77 patients: 50 were diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and 27 snored. After each patient underwent a baseline medical (including a somnographic registration), dental and stomatognathic examination, an MPD that would protrude the mandible 75% of the maximal protrusion range was fabricated.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF