Transplantation is a high-risk, high-cost treatment for end-stage diseases and is the most strictly regulated area of healthcare in the United States. Thus, achieving success for patients and the program requires skillful and collaborative leadership. Various factors, such as outcomes, volume, and financial health, may measure the success of a transplant program.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose Of Review: While living organ donor follow-up is mandated for 2 years in the USA, formal guidance on recovering associated costs of follow-up care is lacking. In this review, we discuss current billing practices of transplant programs for living kidney donor follow-up, and propose future directions for managing follow-up costs and supporting cost neutrality in donor care.
Recent Findings: Living donors may incur costs and financial risks in the donation process, including travel, lost time from work, and dependent care.
Purpose: To provide standardized guidance for transplant programs to maximize financial reimbursement related to living donor care, and to minimize financial consequences of evaluation, surgical and follow-up care to living donor candidates and donors.
Recent Findings: In 2014, the American Society for Transplantation (AST) Live Donor Community of Practice (LDCOP) "Consensus Conference on Best Practices in Live Kidney Donation" identified inconsistencies in billing practices as a barrier to living donor financial neutrality, and issued a strong recommendation that the transplant community actively pursue strategies and policies to make living donation a financially neutral act, within the framework of federal law. The LDCOP convened a multidisciplinary group of experts to review and synthesize current Medicare regulations and commercial payer practices related to billing for living donor care, and the implications for transplant programs and patients.
Purpose: To develop and implement a billing process that fully integrates all activities of a pediatric nephrology and transplant program, by facilitating and coordinating data from patients, physicians, hospitals, and third-party billing services to maximize revenues.
Methods: Financial operations were analyzed via a randomized audit of patient charts that focused on office procedures and revenue collection. Results based on monthly reports documenting revenue received and outstanding, procedures billed, and patient registration accuracy.
Purpose: To evaluate the implementation of a computer system that fully integrates all activities of a transplant center and coordinates secure, live data across the continuum of care.
Methods: Our center implemented a comprehensive patient tracking solution customized at each point of patient entry. Benefits were measured by provider, patient, and staff feedback; time study; and retrospective cost analysis.