Publications by authors named "Andrea Saulsberry"

Introduction: Early lung cancer detection programs improve surgical resection rates and survival but may skew toward more indolent cancers.

Methods: Hypothesizing that differences in stage-stratified survival indicate differences in biological aggressiveness and possible length-time and overdiagnosis bias, we assessed a cohort who had curative-intent resection, categorized by diagnostic pathways: screening, incidental pulmonary nodule program, and non-program based. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier plots, log-rank tests, and Cox regression, comparing aggregate and stage-stratified survival across cohorts with Tukey's method for multiple testing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Biomarker-directed therapy requires biomarker testing. We assessed the patterns of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1) testing in a non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resection cohort. We hypothesized that testing would increase but be unevenly distributed across patient-, provider- and institution-level demographics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Despite its prognostic importance, poor pathologic nodal staging of lung cancer prevails. We evaluated the impact of 2 interventions to improve pathologic nodal staging.

Methods: We implemented a lymph node specimen collection kit to improve intraoperative lymph node collection (surgical intervention) and a novel gross dissection method for intrapulmonary node retrieval (pathology intervention) in nonrandomized stepped-wedge fashion, involving 12 hospitals and 7 pathology groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The quality and outcomes of curative-intent lung cancer surgery vary in populations. Surgeons are key drivers of surgical quality. We examined the association between surgeon-level intermediate outcomes differences, patient survival differences, and potential mitigation by processes of care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Lung cancer surgery with a lymph node kit improves patient-level outcomes, but institution-level impact is unproven.

Methods: Using an institutional stepped-wedge implementation study design, we compared lung cancer resection quality between institutions in preimplementation and postimplementation phases of kit deployment and, within implementing institutions, resections without versus with the kit. Benchmarks included rates of nonexamination of lymph nodes, nonexamination of mediastinal lymph nodes, and attainment of American College of Surgeons Operative Standard 5.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) has proposed a revision of the residual disease (R-factor) classification, to R0, 'R-uncertain', R1 and R2. We previously demonstrated longer survival after surgical resection with a lymph node specimen collection kit, and now evaluate R-factor redistribution as the mechanism of its survival benefit.

Objective: We retrospectively evaluated surgical resections for lung cancer in the population-based observational 'Mid-South Quality of Surgical Resection' cohort from 2009-2019, including a full-cohort and propensity-score matched analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Diastereomers derived from (R,S)-tetrahydroisoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid (Tic), a potential neurotoxin with a chiral fluorescence tagging reagent, (R)-4-nitro-7-(3-aminopyrrolidin-1-yl)-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole (NBD-APy), are well resolved by capillary electrophoresis (CE). For a better understanding of the separation mechanism, a semiempirical computational method (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF