Model refinement increases confidence levels and clinical agreement when commissioning a three-dimensional secondary dose calculation system.

Purpose: Evaluate custom beam models for a second check dose calculation system using statistically verifiable passing criteria for film analysis, DVH, and 3D gamma metrics.

Methods: Custom beam models for nine linear accelerators for the Sun Nuclear Dose Calculator algorithm (SDC, Sun Nuclear) were evaluated using the AAPM-TG119 test suite (5 Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and 5 Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans) and a set of clinical plans. Where deemed necessary, adjustments to Multileaf Collimator (MLC) parameters were made to improve results.

A unified scatter rejection and correction method for cone beam computed tomography.

Purpose: Scattered radiation is a major cause of image quality degradation in flat panel detector-based cone beam CT (CBCT). While recently introduced 2D antiscatter grids reject the majority of scatter fluence, the small percentage of scatter fluence still transmitted to the detector remains a major challenge for implementation of quantitative imaging techniques such as dual energy imaging in CBCT. Additionally, this residual scatter is also a major source of grid-induced artifacts, which impedes implementation of 2D grids in CBCT.

Towards a theory of a solution space for the biplane imaging geometry problem.

Biplane angiographic imaging is a primary method for visual and quantitative assessment of the vasculature. In order to reliably reconstruct the three-dimensional (3D) position, orientation, and shape of the vessel structure, a key problem is to determine the rotation matrix R and the translation vector t which relate the two coordinate systems. This so-called Imaging Geometry Determination problem is well studied in the medical imaging and computer vision communities and a number of interesting approaches have been reported.

Vessel size measurements in angiograms: manual measurements.

Vessel size measurement is perhaps the most often performed quantitative analysis in diagnostic and interventional angiography. Although automated vessel sizing techniques are generally considered to have good accuracy and precision, we have observed that clinicians rarely use these techniques in standard clinical practice, choosing to indicate the edges of vessels and catheters to determine sizes and calibrate magnifications, i.e.

Vessel size measurements in angiograms: a comparison of techniques.

As interventional procedures become more complicated, the need for accurate quantitative vascular information increases. In response to this need, many commercial vendors provide techniques for measurement of vessel sizes, usually based on derivative techniques. In this study, we investigate the accuracy of several techniques used in the measurement of vessel size.