Patient Confidence and Information Preferences During the Treatment Decision-making Process: Results From a Large Multiple Myeloma Patient Survey Across 12 Countries in Europe and Israel.

Background: The relapsing nature of multiple myeloma (MM) means that patients typically receive different and multiple lines of therapy, requiring many treatment decisions over the disease course. The aim of this study was to explore patient confidence and information preferences during the treatment decision-making process.

Patients And Methods: A multinational, cross-sectional survey enrolled patients with MM.

What matters most to patients with multiple myeloma? A Pan-European patient preference study.

Introduction: Given the rapid increase in novel treatments for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), this patient preference study aimed to establish which treatment attributes matter most to MM patients and evaluate discrete choice experiment (DCE) and swing weighting (SW) as two elicitation methods for quantifying patients' preferences.

Methods: A survey incorporating DCE and SW was disseminated among European MM patients. The survey included attributes and levels informed by a previous qualitative study with 24 MM patients.

[Changes resulting from the implementation of the new EU Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 from the perspective of patients].

The currently valid Regulation (EU) 536/2014 on clinical trials with medicinal products for human use brings some innovations that are of great importance for patients who participate in clinical trials and patients with a need for innovative therapies. These concern patient protection, especially for vulnerable patient groups, as well as the conditions for further use of data obtained in clinical trials. The introduction of the largely publicly available information system CTIS (Clinical Trials Information System) will significantly improve the transparency of ongoing clinical trials.

Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials.

Context: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used in parallel with clinical evidence to inform decisions made by industry, clinicians, regulators, health technology assessment bodies and other health-care decision-makers. In addition, PRO data can also guide shared decision making and individual patient choice. Yet, the quality of many PROs in cancer clinical trials is suboptimal and requires improvement to add value to health care and policy decision making.

Living with the burden of relapse in multiple myeloma from the patient and physician perspective.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a progressive plasma cell malignancy, with a range of clinical features including bone lesions, renal insufficiency, anaemia, and hypercalcaemia. Novel agents have significantly improved patient survival, however most patients will suffer multiple relapses. Although clinical challenges and economic costs of relapse are recognised, the psychological impact of relapse is not fully appreciated.