Anatomy education in low-resourced countries: What are challenges and effective and affordable educational strategies? A qualitative study.

Purpose: With limited means, resource-deprived countries must find ways to organize education to meet standards. Few reports exist about anatomical education in LLMICs. This study explores how anatomy teaching is sustained in countries with few resources and which affordable educational strategies are applied to uphold quality.

Are We Facing the End of Gross Anatomy Teaching as We Have Known It for Centuries?

The status of anatomy education in undergraduate medical education has dramatically changed over the course of the past century. From the most important and time-consuming component of the preclinical program, anatomy education has reduced in size and status, and yielded in curricular space to accommodate other disciplines and topics. Meanwhile, radiology has become more prominent, as a means to visualize anatomy, not only in clinical care but also in education.

Approaches of anatomy teaching for seriously resource-deprived countries: A literature review.

Background: Teaching anatomy is an important but expensive part of the medical curriculum, potentially more than many countries can afford. In the search for efficient methods, cost-effectiveness is of utmost importance for such countries. The aim of this contribution is to provide a review of the literature on anatomy teaching methods, evaluating these for feasibility in resource-deprived countries.

Correction to: Does an additional online anatomy course improve performance of medical students on gross anatomy examinations?

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1007/s40670-019-00751-z.].

Does an Additional Online Anatomy Course Improve Performance of Medical Students on Gross Anatomy Examinations?

Aim: An online learning course in anatomy was added to the regular academic anatomy course in the 2nd year of medicine at UNAN-Leon in Nicaragua, using the MOODLE platform. This study aims to determine the learning effect of this course.

Method: Second-year medical students were randomly allocated to an experimental ( = 25) and control group ( = 50).