Background: One of the major causes of reversible visual impairment is a refractive error, which can be corrected through refractive surgery. Data regarding the outcomes and complications of these procedures exist; however, there is a notable gap in understanding the factors leading to patient rejection, particularly in diverse populations like Israel.
Objectives: To detect clinical risk factors of patients who intend to undergo LASIK procedure and to improve the conversion rates of LASIK procedure in this population.
Introduction: The study aimed to compare postoperative pain between alcohol-assisted and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in patients who received the novel analgesic preoperative nepafenac treatment 2 days preoperatively and 3 days postoperatively. Pain, stinging, tearing, light sensitivity, and stress levels were evaluated.
Methods: The study included a retrospective analysis of 55 patients divided into two groups: bilateral alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (aa-PRK) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (transepithelial-PRK).
Aim: To compare the efficacy, safety and stability of laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) Zyoptix and PlanoScan (PS) systems for the surgical correction of myopia with and without astigmatism.
Methods: In this retrospective study we analyzed the results of 198 eyes of 99 patients (randomly chosen) who underwent LASIK Zyoptix treatment and 198 eyes of 99 patients (randomly chosen) who underwent LASIK PlanoScan standard ablation treatment. Patients were followed for a period of 12 months after treatment.
Purpose: To report our experience in preventing diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) by wiping the microkeratome blade with sterile 100% alcohol.
Setting: Enaim Refractive Surgery Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Methods: Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed in 24 patients (48 eyes) on the same day by the same surgeon.