Background: The average treatment effect of antidepressants in major depression was found to be about 2 points on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, which lies below clinical relevance. Here, we searched for evidence of a relevant treatment effect heterogeneity that could justify the usage of antidepressants despite their low average treatment effect.
Methods: Bayesian meta-analysis of 169 randomized, controlled trials including 58,687 patients.
Purpose: In recent years, there has been mounting evidence on the clinical importance of body composition, particularly obesity and sarcopenia, in various patient populations. However, the relevance of these pathologic conditions remains controversial, especially in the field of traumatology. Computed tomography-based measurements allow clinicians to gain a prompt and thorough assessment of fat and muscle compartments in trauma patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Omics data can be very informative in survival analysis and may improve the prognostic ability of classical models based on clinical risk factors for various diseases, for example breast cancer. Recent research has focused on integrating omics and clinical data, yet has often ignored the need for appropriate model building for clinical variables. Medical literature on classical prognostic scores, as well as biostatistical literature on appropriate model selection strategies for low dimensional (clinical) data, are often ignored in the context of omics research.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF