Role of (F-18) Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Cancer: Correlation with Pathological Response and Survival.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the correlation between metabolic response with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and pathological response in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and to study FDG-PET parameters for the prediction of pathological response and outcome.

Methods: Twenty-five patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer underwent two FDG-PET/CT scans for initial staging and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. FDG uptake in the primary tumor was calculated in both scans (SUVmax, SULpeak, and TLG).

Final Results of Neoadjuvant Atezolizumab in Cisplatin-ineligible Patients with Muscle-invasive Urothelial Cancer of the Bladder.

Background: Neoadjuvant immunotherapies hold promise in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

Objective: To report on 2-yr disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival including novel tissue-based biomarkers and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the ABACUS trial.

Design, Setting, And Participants: ABACUS was a multicenter, single-arm, neoadjuvant, phase 2 trial, including patients with MIBC (T2-4aN0M0) who were ineligible for or refused neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Toxicity and Surgical Complication Rates of Neoadjuvant Atezolizumab in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: Updated Safety Results from the ABACUS Trial.

Background: There are limited data on toxicity and surgical safety associated with neoadjuvant programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors prior to radical cystectomy (RC) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

Objective: To present a comprehensive safety analysis of the largest neoadjuvant series, with focus on timing and severity of toxicity and surgical complications occurring after neoadjuvant atezolizumab in patients with MIBC enrolled in the ABACUS trial.

Design, Setting, And Participants: ABACUS (NCT02662309) is an open-label, multicenter, phase II trial for patients with histologically confirmed (T2-T4aN0M0) MIBC, awaiting RC.

Final Overall Survival Analysis of the SOGUG Phase 2 MAJA Study: Maintenance Vinflunine Versus Best Supportive Care After First-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.

Introduction: The MAJA study compared vinflunine (VFL) plus best supportive care (BSC) maintenance therapy versus BSC alone in advanced urothelial carcinoma responsive to first-line chemotherapy. The primary end point of progression-free survival was achieved. We present the final overall survival (OS) and long-term follow-up safety analyses.

Publisher Correction: Clinical efficacy and biomarker analysis of neoadjuvant atezolizumab in operable urothelial carcinoma in the ABACUS trial.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

Clinical efficacy and biomarker analysis of neoadjuvant atezolizumab in operable urothelial carcinoma in the ABACUS trial.

Antibodies targeting PD-1 or its ligand 1 PD-L1 such as atezolizumab, have great efficacy in a proportion of metastatic urothelial cancers. Biomarkers may facilitate identification of these responding tumors. Neoadjuvant use of these agents is associated with pathological complete response in a spectrum of tumors, including urothelial cancer.

Phase II clinical trial of PM00104 (Zalypsis(®)) in urothelial carcinoma patients progressing after first-line platinum-based regimen.

Purpose: This exploratory phase II clinical trial evaluated the antitumor activity, safety profile and pharmacokinetics of PM00104 (Zalypsis(®)) 3 mg/m(2) 1 h every 3-week intravenous infusion in patients with advanced and/or metastatic urothelial carcinoma progressing after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

Methods: The primary efficacy end point was the disease control rate (DCR), defined as the percentage of patients with confirmed objective response or progression-free at 3 months, according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors.

Results: In a first stage (n = 19 patients evaluable for efficacy), only one patient achieved DCR (stable disease as best response and progression-free survival of 3.

[Study of effectiveness of 3 schedules of administration of erythropoietic colony-stimulating factors in anemic patients under chemotherapy for solid or hematology malignancy].

Background And Objective: The treatment of chemotherapy associated anemia in patients with cancer has varied greatly in recent years. The objective of this study was to verify whether the most frequently used therapeutic schedules of erythropoietin administration demonstrate equivalent effectiveness.

Patients And Method: Treatments corresponding to 1,103 patients with cancer receiving treatment with erythropoietic colony-stimulating factors from January 2003 to April 2006 were reviewed.