Therapeutic privilege (TP) is a defence that may be available to doctors who fail to disclose to the patient relevant information when seeking informed consent for treatment if they have a reasonable belief that providing that information would likely cause the patient concerned serious physical or mental harm. In a landmark judgement, the Singapore Court of Appeal introduced a novel interpretation of TP, identifying circumstances in which it might be used with patients who did not strictly lack capacity but might be inclined to refuse recommended treatments. In this paper, we explore the conceptual and practical challenges of this novel interpretation of TP.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA prevailing issue in clinical research is the duty clinicians have to treat or prevent the progression of disease during a study that they are conducting. While all clinical researchers have a duty of care for the patients who participate in clinical research, intervening at the onset or progression of disease may skew results and have a negative impact on the scientific validity of a study. Extreme examples of failures to intervene can be found in the Tuskegee syphilis study and in an attempt to determine if cervical smears were an accurate predictor of cancer, which was uncovered by the Cartwright Inquiry.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnrollment of an adequate number of subjects for a clinical trial is a perennial challenge and this might arguably be even more difficult and complex in trials involving patients with schizophrenia. In this paper, we used a modification of the Prospective Preference Approach (PPA) as a prelude to an actual randomized placebo-controlled trial of a cognitive-enhancing agent for patients with schizophrenia. This approach sought to test and enhance subjects' understanding of the key concepts of the trial, and administered the PPA at baseline and following a brief educational module.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF