Ann R Coll Surg Engl
May 2005
A case is described where both kidneys from non-heart-beating (expanded criteria) donors were dual transplanted ipsilaterally. Although both kidneys passed viability tests on the Newcastle machine preservation system and biomarkers' evaluation, there were logistical issues where the cold ischaemic time was too protracted necessitating the transplantation of both kidneys into one recipient. The recipient had satisfactory outcome with the Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance of 72.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Major urological complications (MUCs) after kidney transplantation contribute to patient morbidity and compromise graft function. Ureteric stents have been successfully used to treat such complications and a number of centers have adopted a policy of universal prophylactic stenting, at the time of graft implantation, to reduce the incidence of urine leaks and ureteric stenosis.
Methods: In conjunction with the Cochrane Renal Group we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference lists of articles, books and abstracts and contacted companies, authors and experts to identify randomized controlled trials examining the use of stents in renal transplantation.
Objective: To prospectively compare the accuracy of multislice spiral computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in evaluating the renal vascular anatomy in potential living renal donors.
Subjects And Methods: Thirty-one donors underwent multislice spiral CTA and gadolinium-enhanced MRA. In addition to axial images, multiplanar reconstruction and maximum intensity projections were used to display the renal vascular anatomy.
In situ aortic perfusion in the nonheart-beating donors (NHBD) is an important procedure to reduce primary warm ischaemic injury prior to formal donor organ retrieval. It allows an interim period to obtain donor family consent and theatre preparation. This study describes our experience of inadequate aortic perfusions resulting from difficult aortic cannulations and associated adverse outcome despite reasonable viability tests.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUnlabelled: A comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy is presented by authors from the UK. They found that the laparoscopic approach could safely be offered to patients treated in experienced units and after adequate training fo the surgeon, with no increase in complications or decrease in efficacy.
Objective: To compare our early experience of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) with a contemporary cohort of conventional open donor nephrectomy (ODN).
Background: With a universal shortage of donor organs, screening and selection of marginal kidneys from non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) provides a valuable source for transplantation. Pre-transplant viability assessment is based on a combination of flow characteristics and assessment of ischaemic tissue injury during NHBD kidney machine perfusion by measurement of total glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity. Successful viability screening has facilitated 69 renal transplants from 60 NHBDs within our transplant centre since 1998, with a first-year graft survival of 90.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF