The new history of psychology II: Some (different) answers to Watrin's four questions.

This article is mainly a response to the article by João Paulo Watrin, "The Ambiguous 'New History of Psychology': Some New Questions to Brock (2017)" (Watrin, 2017), which was itself a reply to my article, "The New History of Psychology: Some (Different) Answers to Lovett's Five Questions" (Brock, 2017). Watrin (2017) suggested that previous writers have conflated the terms "critical history" and "new history." They are said to differ, in that although the former is merely a name for a loose collection of approaches to the history of psychology, the latter involves rhetoric about the historiographical commitments of critical history.

The future of the history of psychology revisited.

In 1994, Kurt Danziger published an article in Theory & Psychology with the title, "Does the history of psychology have a future?" The article attracted a great deal of controversy and is now listed on the journal's website as one of the most cited articles in its history. After providing a synopsis of Danziger's article, I discuss some of the issues that emerged from the controversy that followed its publication. I also ask whether the position of the history of psychology has changed in the intervening years.

The new history of psychology: Some (different) answers to Lovett's five questions.

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 20(2) of (see record 2016-53552-001). In this article there was an error in the 11th paragraph of the Lovett's Five Questions for the New Historians section. The conference paper "The "new" history of science: Implications for philosophy of science" by Rachel Laudan (1992) was wrongly attributed to her husband, Larry Laudan.

How Förster resonance energy transfer imaging improves the understanding of protein interaction networks in cancer biology.

Herein we discuss how FRET imaging can contribute at various stages to delineate the function of the proteome. Therefore, we briefly describe FRET imaging techniques, the selection of suitable FRET pairs and potential caveats. Furthermore, we discuss state-of-the-art FRET-based screening approaches (underpinned by protein interaction network analysis using computational biology) and preclinical intravital FRET-imaging techniques that can be used for functional validation of candidate hits (nodes and edges) from the network screen, as well as measurement of the efficacy of perturbing these nodes/edges by short hairpin RNA (shRNA) and/or small molecule-based approaches.

Identification of potentially effective antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotide (ODN) sequences for inhibiting plasminogen activator inhibitor-2 (PAI-2) production by monocytes.

Objective: Monocyte fibrinolytic activity may influence thrombus resolution. The balance between uPA and PAI-2 could determine the fibrinolytic activity of the monocyte. Inhibiting PAI-2 production using specific antisense sequences might alter this balance.