Neurologic outcome of minimal head injury patients managed with or without a routine repeat head computed tomography.

Background: Previous studies proposed that routine repeat head computed tomography (RHCT) is of little value in patients with a minimal head injury (MHI) and normal neurologic examination (NE). As of 2003, routine RHCT in these MHI patients was ordered at the discretion of the attending physician. The goal of this study was to compare the neurologic outcomes of MHI patients with an intracranial bleed and a normal NE who were managed with or without a routine RHCT.

Utility of repeat head computed tomography in patients with an abnormal neurologic examination after minimal head injury.

Background: Previous studies proposed that repeat head computed tomography (RHCT) is of no value in patients with a minimal head injury (MHI) and normal neurologic examination (NE). The goal of our study was to investigate the value of RHCT in patients with MHI with an abnormal NE.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of adult patients presenting to a Level I trauma center from July 2002 to December 2006 with MHI was performed.

A prospective evaluation of the value of repeat cranial computed tomography in patients with minimal head injury and an intracranial bleed.

Background: Patients with minimal head injury (MHI) and intracranial bleed (ICB) detected on cranial computed tomography (CT) scan routinely undergo a repeat cranial CT within 24 hours after injury to assess for progression of intracranial injuries. While this is clearly beneficial in patients with a deteriorating neurologic status, it is of questionable value in patients with a normal neurologic examination. The goal of this study was to prospectively assess the value of a repeat cranial CT in patients with a MHI and an ICB who have a normal neurologic examination.

Civilian craniocerebral gunshot wounds: an update in predicting outcomes.

Given the high mortality in patients sustaining intracranial injury secondary to gunshot wounds (GSWs), predictors to identify patients at increased risk of death are needed to assist clinicians early in determining optimal treatment. There have been few recent studies involving penetrating craniocerebral injuries, and most studies have been restricted to small numbers of patients, which do not allow for adequate prediction of mortality. A retrospective chart review of 298 patients who sustained GSWs to the head between 1992 and 2003 was conducted at a level 1 trauma center.

Value of repeat cranial computed axial tomography scanning in patients with minimal head injury.

Background: Patients with minimal head injury (MHI) and a cranial computed axial tomography (CAT) scan positive for the presence of intracranial injury routinely undergo a repeat CAT scan within 24 hours after injury. The value of this repeat cranial CAT scan is unclear in those patients who are neurologically normal or improving.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of all adult patients admitted to a level-1 trauma center with MHI and a positive cranial CAT scan during a 32-month period was performed.