Treatment effect and safety of seltorexant as monotherapy for patients with major depressive disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

The antidepressant efficacy and safety of seltorexant monotherapy in major depressive disorder (MDD) was investigated in a placebo-controlled, placebo lead-in, randomized, double-blind, phase 1b study. Participants were randomized to receive seltorexant (20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo. The treatment effect was assessed by changes in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 item (HDRS) from treatment-period baseline to week 5 in lead-in placebo non-responders ("enriched" intent-to-treat analysis set).

Baseline Cognition Is Not Associated With Depression Outcomes in Vortioxetine for Major Depressive Disorder: Findings From Placebo-Controlled Trials.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric disorder for which pharmacologic standard-of-care treatments have limited efficacy, particularly among individuals with cognitive dysfunction. Cognitive dysfunction is observed in approximately 25%-50% of those with MDD, wherein response to standard-of-care medications is reduced. Vortioxetine is an approved antidepressant that has shown evidence of procognitive effects in patients.

Opportunities for use of neuroimaging in de-risking drug development and improving clinical outcomes in psychiatry: an industry perspective.

Neuroimaging, across positron emission tomography (PET), electroencephalography (EEG), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), has been a mainstay of clinical neuroscience research for decades, yet has penetrated little into psychiatric drug development beyond often underpowered phase 1 studies, or into clinical care. Simultaneously, there is a pressing need to improve the probability of success in drug development, increase mechanistic diversity, and enhance clinical efficacy. These goals can be achieved by leveraging neuroimaging in a precision psychiatry framework, wherein effects of drugs on the brain are measured early in clinical development to understand dosing and indication, and then in later-stage trials to identify likely drug responders and enrich clinical trials, ultimately improving clinical outcomes.

A Delphi-method-based consensus guideline for definition of treatment-resistant depression for clinical trials.

Criteria for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and partially responsive depression (PRD) as subtypes of major depressive disorder (MDD) are not unequivocally defined. In the present document we used a Delphi-method-based consensus approach to define TRD and PRD and to serve as operational criteria for future clinical studies, especially if conducted for regulatory purposes. We reviewed the literature and brought together a group of international experts (including clinicians, academics, researchers, employees of pharmaceutical companies, regulatory bodies representatives, and one person with lived experience) to evaluate the state-of-the-art and main controversies regarding the current classification.

Efficacy and Safety of Seltorexant as Adjunctive Therapy in Major Depressive Disorder: A Phase 2b, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Adaptive Dose-Finding Study.

Background: Seltorexant, a selective antagonist of human orexin-2 receptors, demonstrated antidepressant effects in a previous exploratory study in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

Methods: To replicate and extend this observation, a double-blind, adaptive dose-finding study was performed in patients with MDD who had an inadequate response to 1-3 selective serotonin/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors in the current episode. Patients were randomized (2:1:1) to placebo or seltorexant (20 mg or 40 mg) once-daily, administered adjunctively to the antidepressant the patient had been receiving at screening.

Characteristics of patients with major depressive disorder switching SSRI/SNRI therapy compared with those augmenting with an atypical antipsychotic in a real-world setting.

Background: Following a partial response of first-line antidepressant therapy for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), there is a choice to augment treatment with another agent or switch to a different antidepressant.

Objective: To report the prevalence and compare the characteristics of patients switching from their initial selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI) to a new SSRI/SNRI versus those augmenting SSRI/SNRI therapy with a second-generation antipsychotic (SGA).

Methods: MDD patients receiving first-line SSRI/SNRI treatment were identified from a large US-based claims database during 2000-2019.

Abnormal semantic processing of threat words associated with excitement and hostility symptoms in schizophrenia.

Background: Schizophrenia (SZ) is associated with devastating emotional, cognitive and language impairments. Understanding the deficits in each domain and their interactions is important for developing novel, targeted psychotherapies. This study tested whether negative-threat word processing is altered in individuals with SZ compared to healthy controls (HC), in relation to SZ symptom severity across domains.

Comparison of Relapse Prevention with 3 Different Paliperidone Formulations in Patients with Schizophrenia Continuing versus Discontinuing Active Antipsychotic Treatment: A Post-Hoc Analysis of 3 Similarly Designed Randomized Studies.

Background: Sudden discontinuation from antipsychotic treatment is a common occurrence in patients with schizophrenia. Lower rates of relapse could be expected for patients discontinuing treatment from longer-acting formulations vs their shorter-acting equivalents.

Objective: To compare relapse rates and time-to-relapse between the active (analogous to adherent patients) and placebo (analogous to non-adherent patients in the real-world) arms of three different formulations of paliperidone (oral paliperidone extended release [paliperidone ER], paliperidone palmitate once monthly [PP1M], and paliperidone palmitate three monthly [PP3M] long-acting injectables).

Cognitive functioning in adolescents with schizophrenia treated with paliperidone extended-release: 6-Month exploratory analysis from an open-label, single-arm safety study.

Objective: To assess cognitive functioning in adolescents (12-17 years old) with schizophrenia during open-label treatment with paliperidone extended-release (pali ER).

Methods: In this exploratory analysis, adolescents treated with pali ER (oral, flexibly dosed, 1.5-12 mg/day) underwent cognitive assessments at baseline and month 6 using a battery of cognitive tests validated in adolescents.

The effects of a staff-training program in behavior management and social-learning principles on staff-patient interactions within a psychiatric rehabilitation inpatient unit.

Despite the existence of effective behavioral interventions for people diagnosed with serious mental illness (SMI), these continue to be underutilized. Barriers to implementation include a low frequency of staff-patient interactions, as well as a lack of knowledge about, and negative attitudes toward, behavioral interventions. Therefore, we examined the effects of a mandatory behavioral staff-training program on staff-patient interactions on a long-term psychiatric inpatient program for individuals with SMI.

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Characterization of Relapse Risk for Paliperidone Palmitate 1-Month and 3-Month Formulations.

Background: Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models were developed to describe the relationship between the time course of paliperidone plasma concentrations and the risk of relapse of schizophrenia symptoms following administration of paliperidone palmitate 1-month (PP1M) and 3-month (PP3M) long-acting injectables, and to identify relevant covariates for relapse and dropout events.

Methods: Patient data from two global phase 3, relapse prevention studies comparing PP3M to placebo (study A) and PP3M to PP1M (study B) were analyzed. Dropout and relapse data were assessed using survival analysis as two separate single time-to-event models.

Clinical relevance of paliperidone palmitate 3-monthly in treating schizophrenia.

Antipsychotics are the mainstay in schizophrenia management, and long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics contribute to the successful maintenance of treatment by improving non-adherence and preventing relapses. Paliperidone palmitate 3-monthly (PP3M) formulation is the only available LAI antipsychotic that offers an extended 3-month window of stable plasma drug concentration, enabling only four injections per year. This paper summarizes clinically relevant endpoints from available evidence for PP3M to bridge translational research gaps and provide measurable outcomes that can be interpreted in clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of paliperidone palmitate 3-month formulation in Latin American patients with schizophrenia: A subgroup analysis of data from two large phase 3 randomized, double-blind studies.

Objective: To analyze the efficacy and safety of paliperidone palmitate 3-monthly (PP3M) in Latin American patients with schizophrenia vs. rest-of-world (ROW).

Methods: We analyzed data from two multinational, double-blind (DB), randomized, controlled phase 3 studies including patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV-TR) previously stabilized on PP1M/PP3M (open-label [OL] phase).

Predictors of achieving remission in schizophrenia patients treated with paliperidone palmitate 3-month formulation.

Purpose: Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic paliperidone palmitate 3-month formulation (PP3M) is indicated in the United States for the treatment of schizophrenia only after adequate treatment with paliperidone palmitate 1-month formulation (PP1M) for ≥4 months. This analysis aimed to identify patient and disease characteristics during PP1M treatment associated with greater likelihood of achieving remission after transition to PP3M.

Methods: A post hoc analysis of a randomized, Phase III, double-blind, noninferiority trial of PP3M vs PP1M (ClinicalTrials.

Efficacy and safety of paliperidone palmitate 3-month versus 1-month formulation in patients with schizophrenia: comparison between European and non-European population.

Purpose: This randomized, double-blind (DB), non-inferiority phase 3 study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of paliperidone palmitate 3-month (PP3M) vs 1-month formulation (PP1M) in European and non-European patients with schizophrenia.

Patients And Methods: In this randomized, DB, parallel-group study, adult patients (18-70 years) with schizophrenia (per DSM-IV-TR) having Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score between 70 and 120; previously stabilized on PP1M were enrolled. The study had 4 phases: screening (3 weeks), open-label (OL) stabilization (17 weeks), DB (48 weeks) and follow-up (4-12 weeks) phase.

Time to onset and time to resolution of extrapyramidal symptoms in patients with exacerbated schizophrenia treated with 3-monthly vs once-monthly paliperidone palmitate.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of 3-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP3M) vs once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) treatment with regard to extrapyramidal symptom (EPS)-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in patients with schizophrenia, previously stabilized on PP1M treatment.

Patients And Methods: Data on overall incidence, time to onset (TTO), and time to resolution (TTR) of EPS-related TEAEs (overall, subclasses such as dyskinesia, dystonia, hyperkinesia, parkinsonism, and tremor) from a randomized double-blind (DB) non-inferiority study were compared between PP3M and PP1M. Subgroup analysis was performed by age (18-25, 26-50, and 50+ years) and final open-label (OL) dose (50/75, 100, and 150 mg eq.

The Open Translational Science in Schizophrenia (OPTICS) project: an open-science project bringing together Janssen clinical trial and NIMH data.

Clinical trial data are the gold standard for evaluating pharmaceutical safety and efficacy. There is an ethical and scientific imperative for transparency and data sharing to confirm published results and generate new knowledge. The Open Translational Science in Schizophrenia (OPTICS) Project was an open-science initiative aggregating Janssen clinical trial and NIH/NIMH data from real-world studies and trials in schizophrenia.

Paliperidone Palmitate 3-Monthly Versus 1-Monthly Injectable in Patients With Schizophrenia With or Without Prior Exposure to Oral Risperidone or Paliperidone: A Post Hoc, Subgroup Analysis.

Background And Objective: Paliperidone palmitate 3-monthly (PP3M) injectable formulation offers an advantage of improved medication adherence and lower relapse risk in patients with schizophrenia. This post hoc analysis compared outcomes following PP3M versus paliperidone palmitate 1-monthly (PP1M) treatment in patients with schizophrenia treated/untreated with oral risperidone/paliperidone (RIS/PALI).

Methods: Patients were treated with PP1M (50, 75, 100, or 150 mg equivalent [eq.

Use of antipsychotic blood levels in clinician decision making: A cross-over study using clinical vignettes of patients with schizophrenia.

The cause of treatment failure of antipsychotic medications is often difficult to determine in patients with schizophrenia. Evaluation of antipsychotic blood levels (ABLs) may aid clinicians in determining the cause of antipsychotic failure. The Clinical Assessment of the Schizophrenia Patient (CASP) was developed to evaluate clinical decision making during outpatient visits.

Relationship between antipsychotic blood levels and treatment failure during the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study.

Objective: Antipsychotic blood levels (ABLs) may help identify patients at risk for treatment failure. Reference ranges (RR) for plasma concentrations of ABLs that account for between-patient variability were developed for risperidone and olanzapine based on population pharmacokinetic models. The Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) collected clinical outcomes and ABLs, allowing testing of the relationship of ABLs with outcomes.

An assessment of injection site reaction and injection site pain of 1-month and 3-month long-acting injectable formulations of paliperidone palmitate.

Purpose: To evaluate injection site reactions and pain following paliperidone palmitate 1-month (PP1M) and 3-month (PP3M) administration using safety data of double-blind (DB), noninferiority study.

Methods: Patients (n = 1,429) with schizophrenia, treated with PP1M (50-150 mg-eq, 17-week open-label [OL] phase) were randomized to PP1M or PP3M in 48-week DB phase.

Findings: PP1M and PP3M injections were well tolerated.

Bifactor Modeling of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale: Generalized Psychosis Spans Schizoaffective, Bipolar, and Schizophrenia Diagnoses.

Objective: Common genetic variation spans schizophrenia, schizoaffective and bipolar disorders, but historically, these syndromes have been distinguished categorically. A symptom dimension shared across these syndromes, if such a general factor exists, might provide a clearer target for understanding and treating mental illnesses that share core biological bases.

Method: We tested the hypothesis that a bifactor model of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), containing 1 general factor and 5 specific factors (positive, negative, disorganized, excited, anxiety), explains the cross-diagnostic structure of symptoms better than the traditional 5-factor model, and examined the extent to which a general factor reflects the overall severity of symptoms spanning diagnoses in 5094 total patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective, and bipolar disorder.

Measuring pathology using the PANSS across diagnoses: Inconsistency of the positive symptom domain across schizophrenia, schizoaffective, and bipolar disorder.

Although the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was developed for use in schizophrenia (SZ), antipsychotic drug trials use the PANSS to measure symptom change also for bipolar (BP) and schizoaffective (SA) disorder, extending beyond its original indications. If the dimensions measured by the PANSS are different across diagnoses, then the same score change for the same drug condition may have different meanings depending on which group is being studied. Here, we evaluated whether the factor structure in the PANSS was consistent across schizophrenia (n = 3647), bipolar disorder (n = 858), and schizoaffective disorder (n = 592).