Publications by authors named "Adam Karbowski"

The previous research shows that delaying a reward in the dictator game contributes to less generous offers. If the reason for such results is temporal discounting, it can be expected that the effect of delay would be stronger for persons with a higher discounting rate, as well as the analogous pattern should occur in the ultimatum game. The participants of our study took decisions in the dictator and ultimatum game as proposers and responders.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The purpose of this study is to explore the link between imagine-self perspective-taking and rational self-interested behavior in experimental normal-form games. Drawing on the concept of sympathy developed by Adam Smith and further literature on perspective-taking in games, we hypothesize that introduction of imagine-self perspective-taking by decision-makers promotes rational self-interested behavior in a simple experimental normal-form game. In our study, we examined behavior of 404 undergraduate students in the two-person game, in which the participant can suffer a monetary loss only if she plays her Nash equilibrium strategy and the opponent plays her dominated strategy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Based on the assumption that social distance and time are dimensions of psychological distance important for altruistic choices it was predicted that enhancement of altruism due to delaying rewards when choosing between a reward for oneself and for another person would be more pronounced the greater the social distance between the subject and another person. In order to test this hypothesis, social discounting using hypothetical monetary rewards and manipulation of social distance and reward delay was measured in a group of 161 college students. The results indicate that delaying rewards increasingly enhances preference for altruistic choices as the social distance between subject and beneficiary grows.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to investigate how the distance of rewards influences their perceived value, particularly when comparing a smaller, socially closer reward to a larger, socially more distant one.
  • The hypothesis suggested that as both rewards are moved away from the subject, the value of the more distant reward would increase at a slower rate, making it more appealing.
  • The findings revealed that this effect occurred when rewards were moved back 20 places but not when moved back just 10 places, suggesting a connection between social distance and the perception of value, similar to how we value time.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF