Herpes simplex virus (HSV) vaccine development has been impeded by the absence of predictive preclinical models and defined correlates of immune protection. Prior candidates elicited neutralizing responses greater than natural infection but no antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and failed to protect in clinical trials. Primary HSV infection also elicits only neutralizing responses, but ADCC and an expanded antigenic repertoire emerge over time.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHerpes simplex viruses (HSV) cause chronic infections with significant morbidity. Prior vaccines, designed to generate neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) targeting glycoprotein D (gD), failed to provide durable protection. We adopted a different strategy and evaluated a single-cycle virus deleted in gD (ΔgD-2).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThere is an unmet need for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for prevention or as adjunctive treatment of herpes simplex virus (HSV) disease. Most vaccine and mAb efforts focus on neutralizing antibodies, but for HSV this strategy has proven ineffective. Preclinical studies with a candidate HSV vaccine strain, ΔgD-2, demonstrated that non-neutralizing antibodies that activate Fcγ receptors (FcγRs) to mediate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) provide active and passive protection against HSV-1 and HSV-2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The glycoprotein D (gD)/AS04 vaccine failed to prevent herpes simplex virus (HSV) 2 in clinical trials. Failure was recapitulated in mice, in which the vaccine elicited neutralizing antibody but not antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) responses. Preclinical findings suggest that ADCC is important for protection, but the clinical data are limited.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF