Publications by authors named "A T L Fiolet"

Aims: Inflammatory lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs) on lipoproteins convey residual cardiovascular disease risk. The LoDoCo2 (low-dose colchicine 2) trial showed that colchicine reduced the risk for cardiovascular events occurring on standard therapies in patients with chronic coronary disease (CCS). We explored the effects of colchicine on Lp(a) and oxidized lipoprotein associated risk in a LoDoCo2 biomarker subpopulation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Guidelines suggest low-dose colchicine can help prevent secondary cardiovascular issues, but its effectiveness for stroke and safety risks are still uncertain.
  • A meta-analysis of six trials with nearly 15,000 patients showed colchicine reduces the risk of ischaemic stroke and major cardiovascular events by 27% without increasing serious safety concerns.
  • Colchicine's benefits were consistent across different patient groups, and it didn't raise the risk of hospitalization for serious conditions or all-cause mortality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study evaluated the PACAS risk model's ability to identify patients at high risk for severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS) and predict future strokes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.
  • It involved 26,384 patients aged 45-80, finding that 6.3% had severe ACAS at baseline and that higher PACAS scores correlated with increased incidences of stroke and CVD over roughly 70,000 patient-years of follow-up.
  • The PACAS model was confirmed to effectively discriminate and calibrate risk levels, indicating that patients with higher scores had a significantly higher prevalence of severe ACAS and related events during the follow-up period.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Low Dose Colchicine 2 (LoDoCo2) trial randomized 5,522 patients with chronic coronary disease to colchicine 0.5mg daily or placebo in a 1:1 ratio and demonstrated the cardiovascular benefits of colchicine. In the trial, which was conducted in Australia and The Netherlands, a prespecified subgroup analysis suggested a difference in magnitude of treatment effect of colchicine by region (Australia: HR 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF