Publications by authors named "A Stratis"

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) systems specifically designed and manufactured for dental, maxillofacial imaging (MFI) and otolaryngology (OLR) applications have been commercially available in the United States since 2001 and have been in widespread clinical use since. Until recently, there has been a lack of professional guidance available for medical physicists about how to assess and evaluate the performance of these systems and about the establishment and management of quality control (QC) programs. The owners and users of dental CBCT systems may have only a rudimentary understanding of this technology, including how it differs from conventional multidetector CT (MDCT) in terms of acceptable radiation safety practices.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Medical specialties hold varying degrees of prestige, stemming from the existence of stereotypes among them. These have been shown to lead to prejudice against specific specialists, which not only influences career choices but also affects the perception of equality among specialties.

Method: The aim of the research was to determine the presence of stereotypes in the UK veterinary community.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To quantify the eye lens, peak skin and brain doses associated with head CT perfusion exam by means of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) measurements in a cadaver and compare them to Monte Carlo (MC) dose estimations as well as to the CTDI.

Method: 18 TLDs were inserted in the brain, skin, and eye lenses of a female cadaver head, who underwent a CT brain perfusion scan using a Siemens Definition Flash. The table-toggling protocol used 80 kVp, 200 mAs, 32 × 1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Orbital and ocular anatomy is quite complex, consisting of several tissues, which can give rise to both benign and malignant tumors, while several primary neoplasms can metastasize to the orbital and ocular space. Early detection, accurate staging and re‑staging, efficient monitoring of treatment response, non‑invasive differentiation between benign and malignant lesions, and accurate planning of external radiation treatment, are of utmost importance for the optimal and individualized management of ophthalmic oncology patients. Addressing these challenges requires the employment of several diagnostic imaging techniques, such as high‑definition digital fundus photography, ultrasound imaging, optical coherence tomography, optical coherence tomography (OCT)‑angiography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF