Background: VEGF-targeted therapy has become the mainstay of treatment for majority of mRCC patients. For most patients, benefit is short-lived and therefore treatment remains palliative in intent. HD IL2 is an effective immunotherapy treatment capable of durable remission in some patients but its unselected use has been difficult due to its modest response rate and considerable adverse effects.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: As a group of European nurses familiar with treating patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using targeted/chemo- therapies, we aimed to review strategies for managing adverse events (AEs) associated with one targeted therapy, sorafenib.
Method: Focusing on the AEs we considered the most difficult to manage (hand-foot skin reaction [HFSR], diarrhoea, fatigue and mucositis/stomatitis), we reviewed the literature to identify strategies relevant to sorafenib. Given the paucity of published work, this included strategies concerning targeted agents in general.
Metastatic renal cancer remains hard to treat and the treatment is generally palliative. However, high-dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) produced 5% to 10% complete remissions and most of these were durable. With the advent of newer treatments with less toxicity, the role of HD IL-2 is uncertain.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSorafenib, a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor, is approved in Europe for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma whose treatment with an interferon or interleukin-2-based therapy has previously failed, or who are unsuitable for such therapy. Unlike some first-generation anti-cancer therapies, sorafenib is generally associated with moderate and manageable adverse events. Some of the most common adverse events include a hand-foot skin reaction, diarrhoea and rash.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAim: To establish the relationship between the tip position of tunnelled central venous catheters (CVC) and the incidence of venous thrombosis.
Materials And Methods: A randomly sampled, retrospective review of 428 CVC inserted into 334 patients was performed. The chest radiograph obtained post-catheter insertion, as well as follow-up radiographs, linograms, venograms and Doppler ultrasounds (US), were reviewed.