Implications of the Facing Dementia Survey for policy makers and third-party organisations across Europe.

The Facing Dementia Survey included qualitative interviews conducted with 60 persons who influence health care policies in six European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain and the United Kingdom). Respondents generally reinforced the perception of other survey participants that governments do not adequately fund research into the causes and cure of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia. (AD is the most common cause of dementia, and throughout this discussion, issues raised in reference to AD apply also to dementia in general.

Implications of the Facing Dementia Survey for health care professionals across Europe.

Approximately 600 general practitioners, primary care physicians and specialists in six European nations (France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain and UK) who treat patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) were interviewed during the Facing Dementia Survey. Compared with generalists, specialists displayed the most optimism regarding the effects of age, believing that health and memory do not inevitably deteriorate as one grows older. Most physician respondents agreed that the diagnosis of AD is too often delayed.

Implications of the Facing Dementia Survey for the general population, patients and caregivers across Europe.

The Facing Dementia Survey included interviews with approximately 1200 members of the general public, 600 persons who served as primary caregivers for a person with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 96 persons with AD. Members of the general public and the caregivers indicated level of agreement on a 5-point scale to a series of attitudinal statements about the disease as well as other diagnostic questions. Persons with AD underwent a qualitative interview.

Inequalities in dementia care across Europe: key findings of the Facing Dementia Survey.

The Facing Dementia Survey was undertaken to assess the awareness of and behaviours surrounding Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia among all key stakeholders in Europe. Interviews were conducted with more than 2500 persons, including caregivers, members of the general population, physicians, persons with AD and influencers of health care policy. Four key messages emerged from the results.

A comparison of four methods of normal newborn temperature measurement.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to: (a) compare newborn temperature measurements obtained by digital disposable, electronic, and tympanic thermometers with glass mercury thermometers, and (b) compare financial implications of each method.

Methods: In this correlational study, 12 perinatal and neonatal nurses obtained temperature measurements of 184 newborns between 1 and 168 hours of age. The stratified convenience sample was selected using medical records numbers.