Methods for assessing compound identification confidence in metabolomics and related studies have been debated and actively researched for the past two decades. The earliest effort in 2007 focused primarily on mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and resulted in four recommended levels of metabolite identification confidence─the Metabolite Standards Initiative (MSI) Levels. In 2014, the original MSI Levels were expanded to five levels (including two sublevels) to facilitate communication of compound identification confidence in high resolution mass spectrometry studies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMethods for assessing compound identification confidence in metabolomics and related studies have been debated and actively researched for the past two decades. The earliest effort in 2007 focused primarily on mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and resulted in four recommended levels of metabolite identification confidence - the Metabolite Standards Initiative (MSI) Levels. In 2014, the original MSI Levels were expanded to five levels (including two sublevels) to facilitate communication of compound identification confidence in high resolution mass spectrometry studies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnnotating compounds with high confidence is a critical element in metabolomics. C-detection NMR experiment INADEQUATE (incredible natural abundance double-quantum transfer experiment) stands out as a powerful tool for structural elucidation, whereas this valuable experiment is not often included in metabolomics studies. This is partly due to the lack of community platform that provides structural information based INADEQUATE.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF