Keeping up to date with the latest clinical advances in prostate cancer can be challenging. We investigated the impact of guideline use on quality of treatment decisions as well as the impact of a novel, CE-certified clinical decision support tool (Siemens AIPC software) on the amount of time clinicians spend on decision-making in a multicenter setting. Ten urologists assessed ten clinical cases (screening and localized prostate cancer) in three settings: without support, using a digital version of the EAU guidelines, and with the AIPC tool, resulting in 300 clinical decisions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground And Objective: Building on previous research demonstrating better prostate cancer (PC) diagnostics via a biomarker-enhanced approach, this study focuses on cost analysis of PC care using the Stockholm3 test. We assessed the economic impact in European health care systems using real-world evidence for diagnostic outcomes and relevant costs.
Methods: We evaluated two PC diagnostic strategies: (1) the conventional prostate-specific antigen (PSA) strategy with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and (2) PSA testing with a reflex to biomarkers at PSA ≥1.
Background: It has been shown that the Stockholm3 test decreases overdetection of prostate cancer (PCa) while retaining the ability to detect clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in a Swedish population. However, the test includes potentially population-specific testing of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and has yet not been validated outside Scandinavia.
Objective: To assess the performance of the Stockholm3 test in discriminating csPCa in a Central European cohort undergoing prostate biopsy (PBx).
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care
December 2012
Objective: To evaluate endometrial and ovarian effects, and bleeding patterns, among users of Depo-Provera(®), Norplant(®), and Implanon(®).
Study Design: One-hundred and fifty women, who had been using one of these long-acting progestin-only contraceptives (LAPCs) for at least the previous six months, with fifty in each of the groups, were assessed.
Results: All results are mentioned in the following sequence: (1) Depo-Provera(®), (2) Norplant(®), and (3) Implanon(®).
Objective: To determine preoperative method that predicts nature of ovarian tumors.
Methods: Fifty patients with complex pelvic masses assessed preoperatively with two-dimensional ultrasound (2DUS), two-dimensional power Doppler (2DPD), three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS), three-dimensional power Doppler (3DPD), color Doppler.
Results: All patients underwent exploration, 19 (38%) had benign tumors, 31 (62%) had ovarian cancer.