Publications by authors named "A Bindayi"

We compared perioperative outcomes after on-clamp versus off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for >7 cm renal masses. A multicenter dataset was queried for patients who had undergone RAPN for a cT2cN0cM0 kidney tumor from July 2007 to February 2022. The Trifecta achievement (negative surgical margins, no severe complications, and ≤ 30% postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) reduction) was considered a surrogate of surgical quality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We sought to analyze the usefulness of pretreatment C-reactive protein (CRP) as a predictor of survival and oncological outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Methods: Retrospective international analysis of patients with RCC with pretreatment CRP values from 2006 to 2017. A CRP of more than >5 mg/L was deemed elevated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Use of partial nephrectomy (PN) in T3 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is controversial.

Objective: To evaluate quality outcomes of robot-assisted PN (RAPN) for clinical T3a renal masses (cT3aRM).

Design, Setting, And Participants: This was a retrospective multicenter analysis of patients with cT3aN0M0 RCC who underwent RAPN.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The aim of the study was to perform a comprehensive investigation of clinical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in elderly patients presenting with a renal mass. The REnal SURGery in Elderly (RESURGE) collaborative database was queried to identify patients aged 75 or older diagnosed with cT1-2 renal mass and treated with RAPN or LPN. Study outcomes were: overall complications (OC); warm ischemia time (WIT) and 6-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); positive surgical margins (PSM), disease recurrence (REC), cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study compares outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) using papillary vs non-papillary access methods in kidney stone treatment.
  • Researchers analyzed data from 276 patients (69 with papillary access and 207 with non-papillary access) matched for demographics, to assess surgical effectiveness and complications.
  • Findings indicated that non-papillary access is a viable alternative to papillary access, as both methods showed similar operative times, complication rates, and stone-free statuses.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF