Publications by authors named "A Bartak"

Article Synopsis
  • Higher intensity psychotherapy may lead to better treatment outcomes for individuals with depression and comorbid personality disorders.
  • A study compared the effects of 25 vs. 50 sessions of two types of therapy (SPSP and schema therapy) on patients' depression severity over a year.
  • Results indicated that those receiving 50 sessions experienced significantly larger decreases in depression symptoms and higher remission rates for both depression and personality disorders compared to those receiving only 25 sessions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patients with comorbid depression and personality disorders suffer from a heavy disease burden while tailored treatment options are limited, accounting for a high psychological and economic burden. Little is known about the effect of treatment dosage and type of psychotherapy for this specific co-morbid patient population, in terms of treatment-effect and cost-effectiveness. This study aims to compare treatment outcome of 25 versus 50 individual therapy sessions in a year.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Accumulating evidence documents the efficacy of Therapeutic Assessment (TA) in terms of symptom reduction and other outcomes, but only minimal data speak to the patient's perspective of what is memorable, or potentially important, about this intervention. In line with the humanistic and phenomenological philosophy of TA, we solicited patient input by asking personality disorder (PD) patients who participated in a recent randomized controlled trial (De Saeger et al., 2014 ) about their experiences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Our aim was to demonstrate the feasibility of the univariate and generalized propensity score (PS) method in subgroup analysis of outcomes research.

Methods: First, to estimate subgroup effects, we tested the performance of 2 different PS methods, using Monte Carlo simulations: (1) the univariate PS with additional adjustment on the subgroup; and (2) the generalized PS, estimated by crossing the treatment options with a subgroup variable. The subgroup effects were estimated in a linear regression model using the 2 PS adjustments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF